Each month we discuss two different television programmes, that have been chosen at the previous meeting.  In addition, we aim to give recommendations for about other shows that might well be worth watching.

A brief summary of the views considered In last month's meeting where we discussed, Falling and Kevin McClouds' Listed Britain

Our lively meeting focused on the series Falling, written by the creator of Adolescence. The group felt the six-episode show could have been shortened, criticizing the unbelievable age gap and rushed relationship between protagonists Anna and David. Some members felt Keeley Hawes was miscast and too old for the role, preferring her performance in The Durrells. Additionally, Anna's behavior—such as flirting and going home with a man from a bar—seemed highly unrealistic for someone who had been sheltered in a convent since the age of 16.

The onscreen portrayal of religious life sparked a broader group debate about faith and sacrifice. Members with personal convent school experience noted that real-world nuns were rarely as empathetic as those in the series. This led to a deeper discussion regarding Catholic celibacy and the immense lifelong commitment required by those entering religious orders at a young age. Despite these critiques, the group universally liked Francis, the priest, praising his genuine and supportive friendship with David.

The group thoroughly enjoyed Kevin McCloud’s Listed Britain, a five-part series exploring approximately 24 historic sites across the country, including Liverpool Cathedral and Chatsworth House. The inclusion of unlisted sites, like the Radcliffe on Soar power station, clearly illustrated the complex criteria behind graded listings and the societal choices involved in preservation. Members especially appreciated how the show celebrated the vital achievements of local communities and individuals instrumental in saving these buildings.

While the series was universally loved and described by one member as a "gem of a programme," some critiques were raised regarding the hosting style. A few members felt that Kevin McCloud could come across as a bit over the top and occasionally seemed to be acting a part rather than being authentic. Despite these minor complaints, the overall consensus was highly positive, perfectly capturing the group's enthusiasm for the architectural journey.